CRL.M.C./3599/2018 of NARENDER Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Parties
- CRL.M.C./3599/2018 of NARENDER (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
- WRIT PETITION 732 of 2016 (2025)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 3599/2018NARENDER..... PetitionerThrough:Ms. Sonika Tyagi, Adv.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS..... RespondentsThrough:Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State withSI Vikas Mudgal, P.S. Khyala.Respondent no.2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%23.07.2018
Notice. Learned APP accepts notice for respondent no.1. Respondent
no. 2 in present in Court and have been identified by SI Vikas Mudgal ofpolice station Khyala.
It is submitted that petitioner and respondent no. 2 are neighbours. Aquarrel took place between them on some trivial issue which led toregistration of FIR No. 167/2013 under Section 435 IPC against thepetitioner at police station Khyala, on the complaint of respondent no.2.Now, with the intervention of their common friends and other familymembers, petitioners and respondent no. 2 have settled their disputesamicably vide Compromise Deed dated 30[th]June, 2018, therefore, aforesaid
FIR may be quashed.Respondent no. 2 submits that he has settled thematter with the petitioner of his own free will and without any undue force,
pressure or coercion, therefore, he has no objection in case the FIR isquashed. Affidavit of respondent no. 2 in this regard is on record at pages13-14.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the parties
voluntarily, in my view, no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping thecriminalproceedingspending.Accordingly,aforesaidFIRandtheconsequent proceedings emanating thereform are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms.Miscellaneous application
is disposed of as infructuous.
Dasti.
JULY 23, 2018ga
A.K. PATHAK, J.