BAIL APPLN./116/2018 of REHMAN Vs STATE (NCT)OF DLEHI
Parties
- BAIL APPLN./116/2018 of REHMAN (PETITIONER)
- STATE (NCT) OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 116/2018REHMAN..... Petitioner
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. B.S. Chaudhary with Ms. Sneh LataRana, Advs.
versus
STATE (NCT) OF DELHI..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the Statewith Inspector Sunil Kumar, P.S. New Usman Pur
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
O R R%06.07.2018
Crl.M.A.831/2018 (exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
BAIL APPLN. 116/2018
Though the prayer made therein was for interim bail for certaindomestic reasons, the previous application (Bail Appln.1277/2017) wasdeclined by this court keeping in view the gravity of the offences involved inthe case arising out of FIR No.373/2014 under Sections 363/302/201/34IPC, P.S. New Usman Pur wherein the petitioner is facing trial along withco-accused Amit Gupta, alias Monu.
Keeping in view the evidence that has been presented, in the casewhich is pending before the court of Sessions, the charges have already beenfound made out and framed.The prosecution is in the process ofBail Appln.116/2018Page 1 of 2
adducing evidence. It is fairly conceded that prosecution rests its case onevidence that the petitioner was seen in the company of the co-accused,Amit Gupta, under the same roof, shortly after the child had gone missing,mother of the child having visited the place to enquire as to his whereabouts,and that the report of Forensic Science Laboratory affirms presence of DNAof the petitioner in the nail clippings of the deceased child.
Having regard to the above facts, no case for bail is made out. Thebail petition is dismissed.
R.K.GAUBA, J
JULY 06, 2018ns
Bail Appln.116/2018
Page 2 of 2