NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./4182/2018 of MANISH CHAUHAN & ORS Vs THE STATE & ANR

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2018-08-20
Case number
4182/2018

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 4182/2018MANISH CHAUHAN & ORS..... PetitionersThrough:Mr. Ramdas and Mr. Bhavesh, Advs.MANISH CHAUHAN & ORS..... PetitionersThrough:Mr. Ramdas and Mr. Bhavesh, Advs.

versus

THE STATE & ANR..... RespondentsThrough:Ms. Manjit Arya, APP for State withSI Hansraj, P.S. Dwarka North.Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv. for R-2 along with R-2 in person.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%20.08.2018

Notice. Learned APP accepts notice for respondent no.1. Respondent

no.2 is present in Court along with her counsel, who accepts notice. She hasalso been identified by SI Hansraj of police station Dwarka North.

Respondent no.2 submits that she has settled the matter withpetitioner no.1 of her own free will and without any undue force, pressure orcoercion before the Counselling Cell, Family Court, West District, TisHazari Court, Delhi on 18[th]February, 2017. Her marriage with petitionerno.1 has already been dissolved by decree of divorce by mutual consentpassed by the Family Court, South West District, Dwarka Court, New Delhion 24[th]October, 2017.Respondent no.2 further submits that she has noobjection in case FIR No. 442/2016 under Sections 498A/406 IPC registered

at police station Dwarka North is quashed against petitioner no.1 and hisrelatives, that is, petitioner nos. 2 to 4.

Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the petitioner no.1and respondent no.2 voluntarily, in my view, no fruitful purpose would beserved in keeping the criminal proceedings pending.Accordingly, in theinterest of justice, aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings emanatingtherefrom are quashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous application

is disposed of as infructuous.

Dasti.

AUGUST 20, 2018ga

A.K. PATHAK, J.