W.P.(C)/4220/2018 of SHAILENDRA KUMAR Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 4220/2018

SHAILENDRA KUMAR

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar with

Mr. Gaurav Rohilla, Advs. for R-1 & 2.

versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents

Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash with

Mr. Sandeep Malik, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R R27.04.2018

1. Counsels are agreed that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the order dated 26.04.2018 passed in various writ petitions including W.P.(C) No.4190/2018, titled: Vijay Arora vs. Union of India & Anr. In sum, the petitioners seek to avail of the benefits of Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018.

2. Counsel for the petitioner says that qua the subject company i.e., Crescent Infrastructure Private Limited, he seeks application of directives contained in the aforementioned order.

3. To be noted, the petitioner has obtained the consent of the persons who are not petitioners before this Court but are Directors on the Board of the subject company with regard to the relief sought by the petitioner in the captioned writ petition.

3.1 It is in this background that the petitioner has filed copy of the trail mails exchanged between him and the other persons.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the official respondents to apply the directives contained in Vijay Arora

(Supra).

5. It is made clear that the directions contained in aforementioned order will apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioner(s) herein.

6. It is made clear that if there is any other company, apart from the one(s) mentioned in the caption writ petition, whose name has been struck off from the Register of Companies, resulting in the inclusion of the petitioners' names in the impugned list of disqualified directors, then, this order will not come in the way of necessary consequences in law flowing from such circumstance.

7. The Registry is directed to scan and upload the documents furnished by the counsel for the petitioner before this Court today. by the counsel for the petitioner before this Court today.

8. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand closed.

9. Dasti under signatures of the Court master.

APRIL 27, 2018

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J