NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/4382/2018 of HARDEEP SINGH SAWHNEY AND ANR. Vs REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND ORS.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2018-04-27
Case number
4382/2018

Parties

Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 4382/2018

HARDEEP SINGH SAWHNEY AND ANR.

..... Petitioners

Through: Mr. Ketan Madan with Mr. Mukul Rawal, Advs.

versus

REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES AND ORS. Through:

..... Respondents

Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER

O R R% 27.04.2018 CM Appl.No.17000/2018(exemption)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 4382/2018 & CM Appl.No.16999/2018

2. Counsels are agreed that the issue raised in the present writ petition is covered by the order dated 26.04.2018 passed in various writ petitions including W.P.(C) No.4190/2018, titled: Vijay Arora vs. Union of India & Anr. In sum, the petitioners seek to avail of the benefits of Condonation of Delay Scheme, 2018.

3. Counsel for the petitioner says that qua the subject company i.e., Savoia Construction Services Private Limited, he seeks application of directives contained in the aforementioned order.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the official respondents to apply the directives contained in Vijay Arora (Supra). 5. It is made clear that the directions contained in aforementioned order will apply mutatis mutandis to the petitioner(s) herein.

6. It is made clear that if there is any other company, apart from the one(s) mentioned in the caption writ petition, whose name has been struckoff from the Register of Companies, resulting in the inclusion of the petitioners' names in the impugned list of disqualified directors, then, this order will not come in the way of necessary consequences in law flowing from such circumstance.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand closed.

8. Dasti under signatures of the Court master.

APRIL 27, 2018/ak

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J