CRL.M.C./444/2018 of KAMAL NAYAN Vs THE STATE & ORS
Parties
- KAMAL NAYAN (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+CRL.M.C. 444/2018 & Crl. M.A. 1715/2018
KAMAL NAYAN
..... Petitioner
Through:Mr. Sidharth Kapoor, Adv.
versus
THE STATE & ORS
..... Respondents
Through:Mr. Akshai Malik, Addl. PP for theState with SI Sonu
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
O R R%28.02.2018
The petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No. 1190/2016 under
Sections 363/366/376 of IPC and Section 6 of POCSO Act registeredat Police Station Samaipur Badli, Delhi, based on settlement.
It is contended that the parties have settled the disputes and theprosecutrix has married the petitioner.
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the
petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
FEBRUARY 28, 2018
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J