CRL.M.C./4635/2018 of RAJNESH & ORS Vs GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Parties
- RAJNESH & ORS (PETITIONER)
- GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+CRL.M.C. 4635/2018
RAJNESH & ORS...... PetitionersThroughMr. Dinesh Kumar and Mr. VipulGupta,Advs.withpetitionersinperson
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR...... RespondentsThroughMs. Manjeet Arya, APP with ASIBaljit Singh, P.S. Aman ViharRespondent no. 2 in person
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%13.09.2018
Notice.Learned APPaccepts noticeforrespondent no. 1.Respondent no.2-Ms. Priyanka is present in Court and accepts notice. Shehas been identified by ASI Baljit Singh of police station Aman Vihar.
Respondent no.2 submits that she has settled the matter with thepetitioner no. 1 of her own free will and without any undue force, pressureor coercion before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts, Delhi on 1[st]May, 2017. Respondent no.2 submits that her marriage with petitioner no.1has already been dissolved by decree of divorce by mutual consent dated27[th]January, 2018 passed by the Family Courts, North-West District, Rohini
Courts, Delhi. Respondent no. 2 says that she has no objection in case FIRno. 651/2014 under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC registered at Police StationAman Vihar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashedagainst the petitioner no. 1 and his relatives, that is, petitioner nos. 2 to 4.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the petitioners andrespondent no. 2 voluntarily, in my view, no fruitful purpose would beserved to keep the criminal proceedings pending.Accordingly, in theinterest of justice, aforesaid FIR and consequent proceedings emanatingtherefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2018r.bararia
A.K. PATHAK, J.