CRL.M.C./4649/2018 of AMAN DIDWANIA & ORS. Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.
Parties
- AMAN DIDWANIA & ORS (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 4649/2018 and Crl. M.A. no. 31983/2018
AMAN DIDWANIA & ORS...... PetitionersThroughMr. Anirudh Aggarwal, Adv.ThroughMr. Anirudh Aggarwal, Adv.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR...... RespondentsThroughDr. M.P. Singh, APP with SI NareshKumar, P.S. Mansarovar ParkMr.BharatSaini,Adv.withrespondent no. 2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%13.09.2018
Notice. Learned APP accepts notice for respondent no. 1. Respondent
no.2-Ms. Rinki Verma is present in Court along with her counsel andaccepts notice.She has been identified by SI Naresh Kumar of policestation Mansarovar Park.
Respondent no.2 submits that she has settled the matter with thepetitioner no. 1 of her own free will and without any undue force, pressureor coercion before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhion 10[th]June, 2016. Respondent no. 2 submits that her marriage withpetitioner no.1 has already been dissolved by decree of divorce by mutualconsent dated 3[rd]November, 2017 passed by the Family Courts, Shahdara
District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. Petitioner no. 1 has paid `1,00,000/-to the respondent no. 2, vide demand draft, photocopy whereof has beenplaced on record. Respondent no. 2 says that entire settled amount standspaid with this payment and she has no objection in case FIR no. 498/2015under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry ProhibitionAct, 1961 registered at Police Station Mansarovar Park and consequentproceedings emanating thererom are quashed against the petitioner no. 1 andhis relatives, that is, petitioner nos. 2 to 5.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the petitioners andrespondent no. 2 voluntarily, in my view, no fruitful purpose would beserved to keep the criminal proceedings pending.Accordingly, in theinterest of justice, aforesaid FIR and consequent proceedings emanatingtherefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applicationis disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.
SEPTEMBER 13, 2018r.bararia
A.K. PATHAK, J.