W.P.(CRL)/3873/2018 of JASPAL SINGH Vs STATE & ANR.
Parties
- JASPAL SINGH (PETITIONER)
- STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (1)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 3873/2018
JASPAL SINGH ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Raina and Ms.Irum Raina, Advocates Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Raina and Ms.Irum Raina, Advocates
versus
STATE & ANR.
..... Respondents
Represented by: Ms.Amita Sachdeva, Advocate for Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for the State with SI Prem Pal Sharma, PS Mukherjee Nagar Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for the State with SI Prem Pal Sharma, PS Mukherjee Nagar
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R R% 19.12.2018
Crl.M.A.No.50146/2018
Allowed subject to just exceptions.
W.P.(Crl.) No.3873/2018
1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.110/2014 under Sections 354/506/509/427 IPC registered at PS Mukherjee Nagar on the complaint of respondent No.2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that the parties have settled the matter.
2. Learned proxy counsel for learned Additional Standing Counsel for
the State on instructions submits that in the above noted FIR the petitioner is the only accused and the respondent No.2 is the only complainant/victim. W.P.(CRL) 3873/2018 page 1 of 2
3. Respondent No.2 who is present in Court and is identified by the Investigating Officer states that the petitioner is nephew of her husband and the abovnoted FIR was registered due to family dispute between the parties and now since family settlement has been arrived at copy whereof is annexed at Annexure P-4 to the present petition, she does not want to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto and undertakes to abide by the terms of family settlement dated 11[th] October, 2018.
4. Petitioner who is present in Court and is identified by the learned counsel affirms the statement of respondent No.2 and undertake to abide by the terms of family settlement arrived at between the parties,
5. In view of the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, volition and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings, it would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedingspursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.
6. Consequently, FIR No.110/2014 under Sections 354/506/509/427 IPC registered at PS Mukherjee Nagar and proceedings pursuant thereto arehereby quashed.
7. Parties have signed this order sheet in acknowledgment of their statements made before this Court.
8. Petition and application are disposed of. Order dasti.
DECEMBER 19, 2018/mamta
W.P.(CRL) 3873/2018
MUKTA GUPTA, J.