CRL.M.C./6163/2018 of UMKESHKANT & ORS Vs STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
Parties
- UMKESHKANT & ORS (PETITIONER)
- STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+CRL.M.C. 6163/2018 and Crl. M.A. no. 48850/2018
UMKESHKANT & ORS...... Petitioners
ThroughMs. Charu Dalal and Mr. Ajay PratapSingh, Advs.Singh, Advs.
versus
STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS
.... Respondents
ThroughDr.M.P.Singh,APPwithASIBalvinder Singh, P.S. Sangam ViharMr.RajbirSinghBal,Adv.forrespondent nos. 3 to 6Balvinder Singh, P.S. Sangam ViharMr.RajbirSinghBal,Adv.forrespondent nos. 3 to 6
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R R%05.12.2018
Notice.
Learned APP accepts notice for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
Respondent nos. 3 to 6, namely, Yogendra, Suman, Anil Kumar Jha andVivek Kumar are present in Court along with their counsel and acceptnotice. They have been identified by ASI Balvinder Singh of police stationSangam Vihar.
It is submitted that petitioners, namely, Umeshkant, Bindu Devi,Ravikant, Deepak and Rohit Singh and respondent nos. 3 to 6 areneighbours.A quarrel took place between them on some trivial issues,which led to the incident, resulting in registration of FIR no. 427/2017 under
Sections 308/34 IPC at police station Sangam Vihar on the complaint ofrespondent no. 5 Anil Kumar Jha. With the interventions of their commonfriends and other family members, petitioners and respondent nos. 3 to 6have settled their disputes amicably, vide Memorandum of Understandingdated 12[th]November, 2018. Respondent nos. 3 to 6 admit having settled thematter with petitioners of their own free will, voluntarily and without anyundue force, pressure or coercion and they have no objection in caseaforesaid FIR and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashedagainst the petitioners.
Keeping in mind the settlement arrived at between the petitioners andprivate respondents voluntarily, in my view, no fruitful purpose would beserved to keep the criminal proceedings pending.Accordingly, in theinterest of justice, aforesaid FIR and consequent proceedings emanatingtherefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applicationis disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.
DECEMBER 05, 2018r.bararia
A.K. PATHAK, J.