W.P.(C)/687/2018 of CINESTAAN ENTERTAINMENT (P) LIMITED Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2018-02-09
Case number: 687/2018

Parties

CINESTAAN ENTERTAINMENT (P) LIMITED (PETITIONER)
INCOME TAX OFFICER (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)

Statutes cited (1)

indian penal code (1860)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Section

$~1. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 687/2018

CINESTAAN ENTERTAINMENT (P) LIMITED ..... Petitioner

Through Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manisha T. Karia, Mr. Ashutosh Mohan Rastogi & Mr. Shashank Mangal, Advocates. Manisha T. Karia, Mr. Ashutosh Mohan Rastogi & Mr. Shashank Mangal, Advocates.

versus

INCOME TAX OFFICER

..... Respondent

Through Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda & Mr. Anand

K. Chaudhuri, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R R31.01.2018

After some hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file an appeal. He also states that they will be moving appropriate application for stay of demand. Appeal, if filed within 15 days from today, would not be dismissed on the ground of limitation.

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. We clarify that we have not expressed any opinion on merits.

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

JANUARY 31, 2018 VKR/NA

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.