O.M.P. (T) (COMM.)/43/2018 of SHRI SAI NATH ENTERPRISES Vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Parties
- SHRI SAI NATH ENTERPRISES (PETITIONER)
- DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 43/2018
SHRI SAI NATH ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Rajesh Gupta andMr.Harpreet Singh, Advs.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
..... Respondent Through Mr.Ashim Shridhar and Mr.Shashi Pratap Singh, Advs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R R28.05.2018
IA No.7489/2018 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 43/2018
This petition under Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) has been filed by the petitioner seeking appointment of substitute Arbitrator in light of recusal of the Arbitrator appointed by this Court vide order dated 04.09.2017.
Learned counsel for the respondent, who appeared on advance notice, submits that the respondent has no objection if substitute Arbitrator is appointed.
Having perused the contents of the petition as well the no objection expressed by the learned counsel for the respondent, Justice R.C.Chopra, Retired Judge of this Court (N-7, Greater Kailash-I, New Delhi-110048,
Mobile No.[REDACTED]) is appointed as substitute Arbitrator. He shall conduct the arbitration under the aegis of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) and the arbitration proceedings shall be governed by the DIAC Rules as to its procedure and fee.
This Court in its order 20.02.2018 passed in Arb. A.(COMM) 49/2017 had directed the Arbitral Tribunal to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner under Section 17 of the Act within period of six weeks from the date of the said order, however, due to recusal of the Sole Arbitrator, the said application is still pending adjudication. It is directed that the substitute Arbitrator now been appointed shall dispose of the said application within six weeks from the date of the communication of this order.
The petition is allowed in the above terms, with no order as to cost. Dasti.
MAY 28, 2018/Arya
NAVIN CHAWLA, J