W.P.(C)/812/2018 of SH. PRAMOD KUMAR AND ORS. Vs NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Parties
- SH. PRAMOD KUMAR AND ORS (PETITIONER)
- NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 812/2018
SH. PRAMOD KUMAR AND ORS.
..... Petitioners Mr.Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
Through:
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel with Ms.Shashi Gupta, Advocate for respondent/NDMC.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL O R R
12.02.2018
Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are regular street vendors and vending at the road outside of the Old or New Delhi Railway Station for the past many years. Fear of removal by the respondent has led to the filing of this writ petition.
Mr.Gupta, counsel appearing for respondent submits that the petitioners are not regular street vendors. No details of their vending sites have been provided. Neither any document nor photographs have been placed on record to show as to where the petitioners are vending. He further submits that the Amended Rules have been notified and the proper course for the petitioners would be to approach the Town Vending Committee as and when it is constituted.
W.P.(C) 812/2018
Page 1 of 2
At this stage, counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners would approach the Town Vending Committee (in short ‘TVC’) as and when constituted with supporting documents to consider the case of the petitioners.
In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of.
TVC is directed to consider the application of the petitioners in accordance with law as and when filed.
G.S.SISTANI, J
FEBRUARY 12, 2018 ssc
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
W.P.(C) 812/2018