W.P.(C)/926/2018 of JASWANT SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Parties
- Digitally SignedBy:AMULYA (PETITIONER)
- Union of India &Ors (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
$~ri and 12.
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(C) 881/2018GAJRAJSINGHPetitionerThrough:Mr. Ankur Chhibber,Advocate.versusUNIONOF INDIA&ORSRespondentsThrough:Ms. SarojBidawat,Advocate.+ ,W.P.(C) 926/2018JASWANTSINGHPetitionerThrough:Mr. PrabhashGiri, Advocate.versusUNIONOF INDIA&ORSRespondentsThrough:Mr. RoshanLai Goel, AdvocateandMs. Anju Gupta, Advocate.
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLIHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANIORDER%15.05.2018
1.Two opportunities have been granted to the counsel for therespondentsto obtain instructionsfrom the Departmentas to whether thepresentcases are covered-bya commonjudgmentdated 17.10.2017passedby. DivisionBench in W.P.(C) No.9359/2017entitledSI/GD Shambhoovs. Union ofIndia & Ors.. followedin W.P.(C)332/2017entitledJas Ramvs. Union of India and Ors. and other connected matters decided on12.01.2018.
2.Today, learned counsel for the respondents fairly states oninstructionsthat the present cases are covered by the decisions in thecaptioned cases.W.P.(C)881/2018and W.P.(C)926/2018Page1 of2
3.Accordingly, theorder dated17.01.2015 passed in W.P.(C) passed in W.P.(C) in W.P.(C) W.P.(C)No.881/2018is set aside and boththe petitionsare allowedand disposedofin terms of the order dated 12.01.2018,passed in batch of petitionsleadmatter being W.P.(C) No.332/2017 entitled Jas Ram vs. Union of India &Ors.
17.01.2015 passed in W.P.(C) passed in W.P.(C) in W.P.(C) W.P.(C)
HIMA KOHLI, J
MAY 15,2018na/rkb•
TIBHA
W.P.(C)881/2018and W.P.(C) 926/2018
Page 2 of2