W.P.(C)/8907/2017 of EX-INSP RANVIR SINGH Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Parties
- •order29;0i.2ai8 (PETITIONER)
- Union of India and Ors. and other connected^cases, and judgment dated 12,01.2018 passed in W.P.(C) No.332/2017 .•entitled Jas Ram vs. Union of India and Ors. and other connected cases.--W.P:(C)8897/20 (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
'••$~15/and-L6.\;i;*IN THE HIGH GQURT OF DELHI AT NEW DEtffl+:W.P.(C)8897/2017andW.P.(C)8907/2017HARENDER SINGH^".....PetitionerfeX^NSPRANVIRSINGHr,V,^ Through:]^. Ai±iirChhibber,Advocate.
".....PetitionerV,.....Petitioner
•' ; • •
/'versus
OF INDIAAND ORS.,.Through:Mr. R.v. Sinhaand JVfr. AmitSinha;'.Advocates.,,-.
Respondents.
. CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLIHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
:•order29;0i.2ai8
1.The petitioners,who were worldng.in thehave filed the•pi*esent petitionspraying inter-alia for issuance:of- writ of mandamus,directing the respondents to re-fix their'pay and further directing the ,respondentsto grant secondfinancialupgradatiorito them underthe ACPSchemewith all consequentialbenefits. ;.- 2.Learnedcounselfor the ipetitionersstatesthatthe facts of the preserit 'case are squarely covered by two decisions of co-ordinate Benches of this,, Court, i.e., judgmentdated 11.10.2017passed iri, W.P.(C) No.9359/2016,er^titled SI/GD Shambhoo vs. Union of India and Ors. and other connected^cases, and judgment dated 12,01.2018 passed in W.P.(C) No.332/2017 .•entitled Jas Ram vs. Union of India and Ors. and other connected cases.--W.P:(C)8897/2017andW.P.(C)8907/2017:Page1of2
Signature Not Verified
3.^Copies of the aforesaidjudgments have been handed'over by learnedcounsel for the petitioners to the learned counsel for the respondents and|also furnished to us. ;4. •;Mr. Sinlia, learnedcounsel for the"respondentsfairly states that the. facts of the present petitions are no different from those referred to in thevcaptioned,matters..
: 5.Accordingly, the present petitions are allowed. The impugned ordersdated 08.10.2015passed by the respondents,in both the cases, withdrawing ;the earlier order dated 30.04.2015^,quashed and set aside. Furtherj therespondentsare directedto re-fixthe salariesof the petitionersin terms ofthe earher.order dated 30.04.2Q15,as per Clause I Rule 7(i)(A) of the GCS(Revised Pay) Rules, 2008.' .
6. 'The.petitions are disposed ,of. The parties are left to bear their ovm.costs.. >•
HIMAKOHLI, J
REKH
JANUARY 29,2018n^rkb
tV.P.(Cj8897/2017and W.P.(C)8907/2017
Page 2 of2,