CRL.L.P./592/2016 of RAHISEN Vs STATE & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2018-12-06

Parties

Represented by: Mr. Renu Gautam Sharma, Ms. Ritu Gautam, Ms. Savita Bhadana, Advs (PETITIONER)
STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.M.C./853/2017 of NITISH KUMAR Vs STATE & ORS. (2018)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.L.P. 592/2016 RAHISEN

..... Petitioner

Represented by: Mr. Renu Gautam Sharma, Ms. Ritu Gautam, Ms. Savita Bhadana, Advs.

versus

STATE & ANR.

..... Respondent

Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with ASI Rajender Singh PS Saket.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

06.12.2018

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and respondent No.2 along with their daughter are living together peacefully and happily and the issue of the admission of daughter has also been sorted out. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

DECEMBER 06, 2018 ‘ga’

MUKTA GUPTA, J.