BAIL APPLN./2691/2018 of ASGAR ALI @ SAHIL Vs THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT ) DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2018-12-17

Parties

ASGAR ALI @ SAHIL (PETITIONER)
THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT ) DELHI (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 2691/2018

ASGAR ALI @ SAHIL

..... Petitioner

Through:Mr.Vivek Bansal, Adv.

versus

THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT ) DELHI..... RespondentThrough:Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP with SIVikram Singh and W/SI Sumitra,P.S.Rajouri Garden.

..... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVAO R R%17.12.2018

1.Status report filed. Same is taken on record.

2.After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitionersubmits that in case directions are issued for expeditious disposal ofthe case, he shall not press his application at this stage.

3.Learned APP informs that the prosecutrix has already beenexamined and mother of the prosecutrix is under cross examinationand thereafter only officials/proforma witnesses are remaining.

4.Keeping in view the totality of the facts and circumstances ofthe case and also the fact that the petitioner has been in custody since24.06.2014, Trial Court is directed to expedite the recording of theprosecution witnesses and endeavour to conclude the same preferably

within period of nine months from the next date of hearing beforethe Trial Court.

5.In view of the above directions, learned counsel for thepetitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

6.Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with theaforesaid directions.

7.Order Dasti under signatures of Court Master.

DECEMBER 17, 2018rk

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J