NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.A./469/2002 of MAHESH Vs STATE

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2018-01-05

Parties

Cited by (2)

Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.

Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)

1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+CRL.A. 469/2002

MAHESH..... Appellant

Through: None.

versus

STATE..... Respondent

Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHARJUSTICE I.S.MEHTAO R R%05.01.2018

1. None appears for the appellant.

2. This appeal was admitted way back in 2002 and on 8[th]September 2005the sentence was suspended. From the memo of parties, it is seen that theAppellant has his permanent address in Farukkabad, U.P.

3. The police officer from PS Ambedkar Nagar is not in position to informwhether the Appellant is available at the given address.

4. The present appeal has been shown on the regular board of this Court forwell over two months now. If notices are now sent to the Appellant for hisappearance in Court, it would in all probability not be served and there willhave to be indefinite wait for that to happen. The better course thatcommends itself to the Court is that this appeal be dismissed in default with

permission to the Appellant to apply to this Court to revive the appeal forhearing immediately after his appearing before this Court in person.

5. Meanwhile, the SHO of the concerned PS will also make persistent effortsto trace the Appellant and take further consequential steps upon thedismissal of this appeal. As soon as Appellant is taken into custody, theSHO will file report in this Court and instruct the APP to immediatelymention the appeal for listing.

6. The appeal is accordingly dismissed with the aforesaid directions. Thepersonal bond and surety bond furnished stand cancelled.

S.MURALIDHAR, J

JANUARY 05, 2018nd

I.S.MEHTA, J