W.P.(CRL)/3348/2018 of RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
Parties
- Represented by: Mr. Prakash Verma, Adv (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 3348/2018
RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA
..... Petitioner
Represented by: Mr. Prakash Verma, Adv.
versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
..... Respondent
Represented by: Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with SI Pushpendra PS B.H. Rao. Mr. Sumit Purkayastha, Adv. for Mr. Naveej Raheja, Adv. for R-6/DDA.
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R R% 13.12.2018
Crl.M.A. 35400/2018
Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.
Crl.M.A. 35401/2018
For the reasons stated in the application delay of 48 days in refiling is condoned.
Application is disposed of.
W.P.(CRL) 3348/2018
Notice. Learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State accepts notice. He has handed-over the status report which is taken on record.
As per the status report the complaint was lodged at PS Bara Hindu Rao, however execution of all the documents relating to the deal of property
page 1 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 3348/2018
registration and agreement took place in the premises of Tis Hazari Court which falls within the jurisdiction of PS Sabzi Mandi and not in the jurisdiction of PS Bara Hindu Rao and the property is situated in Rohini, hence, complainant may approach the concerned Police Station i.e. PS Sabzi Mandi.
Since petitioner has an alternate remedy of filing complaint case before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, this Court finds no ground to entertain the petition.
Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to take remedies as available in law.
DECEMBER 13, 2018 ‘ga’
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
W.P.(CRL) 3348/2018