W.P.(CRL)/1594/2018 of PREM KUMAR Vs STATE
Parties
- PREM KUMAR (PETITIONER)
- STATE (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (7)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
- CRL.M.C./5002/2023 of MD EHSAAN AND ANR Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR (2024)
- CRL.M.C./5336/2024 of UMESH @GOLLU Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR (2024)
- CRL.M.C./3448/2023 of RAHIM Vs STATE AND ANR. (2024)
- CRL.M.C./4531/2023 of ANIL @ BOBBY Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (2024)
- CRL.M.C./3792/2024 of ABHINANDAN Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI & ANR. (2024)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1594/2018
PREM KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate Represented by: Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate
versus
STATE ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC for the State with SI Dharmendra Pratap Singh, PS Samaipur Badli
CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA
O R R20.09.2018
1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks parole on the ground that he has to file Special Leave Petition, arrange funds for the same and maintain social ties and also challenges the communication dated 16[th] April, 2018 whereby the application seeking parole was rejected.
2. status report has been filed. As per the status report, the family of the petitioner comprising his wife, two daughters and one son was found residing at H.No.D-40, Bhagat Singh Park, Near Kaptan Chowk, Village Siraspur, Delhi. As per the latest nominal roll, the appellant has been in continuous custody since 16[th] June, 2016 the date when he was arrested and thus undergone total imprisonment of more than two and half years including remissions. Considering that there is no other elder member in the family because the wife of the petitioner is working as labour to file W.P.(CRL) 1594/2018 page 1 of 2
the SLP, this Court deems it fit to grant parole to the petitioner. It is, therefore, directed that the petitioner be released on parole for period of four weeks on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of ₹10,000/- with one surety bond of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the Superintendent, Rohini Jail.
3. Petition is disposed of.
4. Copy of this order be communicated to the petitioner through Superintendent, Rohini Jail.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2018
mamta
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
W.P.(CRL) 1594/2018