BAIL APPLN./2056/2018 of MRS. RENU Vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)
Parties
- + BAIL APPLN. 2056/2018 MRS. RENU (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 2056/2018MRS. RENU..... PetitionerMRS. RENU..... Petitioner
Through:Mr.SumitKumar,Mr.JeewanChandra and Mr. Rabindra Nanda,Advs.Chandra and Mr. Rabindra Nanda,Advs.
versus
THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)..... RespondentThrough:Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBAO R R%04.09.2018
The petitioner herein is the married sister of Amar Kumar Pandeywhose wife Lovli Kumari died on 06.07.2018. It appears that the deceasedwas taken to the hospital by her husband where she was declared broughtdead. It does appear as highly incriminating circumstance that she wasmarried to Amar Kumar Pandey only on 11.05.2018 but the cause of death isnot yet ascertained. The father of the deceased, while lodging the FIR, hassuspected foul play, in his opinion, the death being homicidal.Thepetitioner being married was apparently living in separate house in adifferent locality.Though, allegations have been made also against herrespecting the demand of Rs.3,00,000/, such allegations, prima facie, appearto be omnibus and by including all possible relatives of Amar KumarPandey. There is no allegation of the petitioner being present around thetime the victim suffered causes that may have resulted in her death.BAIL APPLN. 2056/2018Page 1 of 2
Having regard to these facts, the prayer is granted. The petitioner isdirected that in the event of the she being arrested, she shall be releasedon bail by the arresting officer on furnishing personal bond in the sum ofRs.20,000/- with one surety in the like amount subject to the followingfurther conditions:-
(i)The petitioner shall continue cooperating with the investigation andjoin the same as and when called upon to do so;
(ii)The petitioner shall not come in contact with or try to influence any ofthe witnesses connected to the case;
(iii)Prior to her release, she shall give the telephone numbers of self andof at least one other responsible family member besides that of the surety tothe investigating officer;
(iv)She shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat orpromise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuadehim/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer ortamper with the evidence;
Dasti.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
SEPTEMBER 04, 2018/uj
BAIL APPLN. 2056/2018