BAIL APPLN./2553/2018 of GEETA ARORA @ SONU PUNJABAN Vs STATE
Parties
- + BAIL APPLN. 2553/2018 GEETA ARORA @ SONU PUNJABAN (PETITIONER)
- STATE (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 2553/2018GEETA ARORA @ SONU PUNJABAN..... PetitionerGEETA ARORA @ SONU PUNJABAN..... Petitioner
ThroughMr. Kirti Uppal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.FarooqueChaudhary,Ms.AasthaDhawan and Ms. Shaini Bhardwaj,Advs.FarooqueChaudhary,Ms.AasthaDhawan and Ms. Shaini Bhardwaj,Advs.
versus
STATE..... Respondent
ThroughMs. Kusum Dhalla, Addl. PP for theState with ACP Siddharth Jain, CyberCell, Crime Branch and W/SI PankajNegiState with ACP Siddharth Jain, CyberCell, Crime Branch and W/SI PankajNegi
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVAO R R
%19.12.2018
1.After some arguments, learned Senior Counsel for petitioner,under instructions, submits that in case the directions are issued forexpeditious recording of the prosecution evidence, he shall not pressthis application, at this stage.
2.Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, thetrial court is directed to expedite the recording of the prosecutionwitnesses and endeavour to conclude the same within period of 9months from the next date of hearing before the trial court.
3.In view of the above directions, learned Senior Counsel forpetitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. He, however, reserves
the right to file petition for interim bail on the ground of the medicalcondition of mother of the petitioner.
4.Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid direction.
DECEMBER 19, 2018‘rs’
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J