NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(CRL)/952/2019 of CHIRAG @ CHIRAG PARMAR & ORS Vs THE STATE & ANR

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2019-04-02
Case number
0637 of 2016

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 952/2019 CHIRAG @ CHIRAG PARMAR & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajesh Nautiyal, Adv

versus

THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents

Through: Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC with SI Narender Singh, PS Lahori Gate Respondent No. 2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL O R R

% 02.04.2019

CRL.M.A. 6949/2019 (exemption)

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 952/2019

The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking quashing of the FIR No. 0637/2016 registered at PS Sarai Rohilla, Delhi for the offences punishable under Section 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short ‘IPC'), on the complaint of respondent No. 2 and the proceedings pursuant thereto on the ground that compromise has been arrived at between the parties in the matter vide compromise dated 19.11.2016 and parties have started living together since 03.12.2016.

All the petitioners and Respondent No. 2 are present in Court today and have been identified by the learned counsel for the petitioners and investigating officer respectively. Respondent No.2 states that she has settled the matter with the petitioners with her own free will and choice

without any threat, pressure and coercion as per Compromise Deed dated 19.11.2016. She further submits that she does not wish to pursue the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings thereto.

Keeping in view the fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences voluntarily and out of their own free will and without any coercion, pressure, no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the proceedings. It would be in the interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. Consequently, FIR No. 0637/2016 registered at PS Sarai Rohilla, Delhi for the offences punishable under Section 498A/406/34 IPC and proceedings pursuant thereto are hereby quashed.

The petition is disposed of.

APRIL 02, 2019 SU

SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J

Petitioner No.1

Petitioner No. 2

Petitioner No. 3

Respondent No. 2