W.P.(C)/11659/2018 of NARESH SINGH Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2019-07-30
Case number: 11659/2018

Parties

NARESH SINGH (PETITIONER)
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

BAIL APPLN./1697/2020 of SHAHJADA IRFAN Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI (2020)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 11659/2018

NARESH SINGH

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Manmohan, Adv.

versus

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr. Manashwy Jha, Adv. for

Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC (Civil), GNCTD for R1, R2, R5 and R6. GNCTD for R1, R2, R5 and R6.

Mr. Amit Sinha, Adv. for R4/EMC. Mr. Biraja Mahapatra and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advs. for DPCC. Mr. Biraja Mahapatra and Mr. Sumit Mishra, Advs. for DPCC.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO O R R% 30.07.2019

status report has been prepared by respondent East Delhi Municipal Corporation. The same is taken on record. Para 1 and 2 of the status report reads as under:

1.That, the deponent is well conversant of the facts of this case and is competent to swear the present affidavit in this official capacity, on the basis of the reports and available records and competent to file the present status report on behalf of East Delhi Municipal Corporation. is competent to swear the present affidavit in this official capacity, on the basis of the reports and available records and competent to file the present status report on behalf of East Delhi Municipal Corporation.

2.That the area Inspector of General Branch, Shadara North Zone was Inspected / Visited in the Gali No. 4, Shaheed Bhagat Singh was Inspected / Visited in the Gali No. 4, Shaheed Bhagat Singh

–Colony, Karawal Nagar, Delhi 110094 at the time of inspection

all properties were lying vacant.”

Some photographs have also been annexed along with the status report. copy of the same has been given to the learned counsel for the petitioner. The petitioner who is present in person disputes the position as being reflected in the photographs as according to him, the factory is still running from the same place. If that be so, appropriate shall be for the petitioner to approach the Monitoring Committee constituted by the Supreme Court.

The writ petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Monitoring Committee.

JULY 30, 2019/jg

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J