BAIL APPLN./509/2019 of VIKAS SEHRAWAT@VICKY Vs THE STATE
Parties
- VIKAS SEHRAWAT@VICKY (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
06.03.2019 12:29
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 509/2019 & Crl.M.A. 4419/2019
VIKAS SEHRAWAT@VICKY..... PetitionerThrough:Mr. Bharat Dubey, Mr. AbhishekKaushik & Ms. Shubhlaxmi Dubey,Advs.Through:Mr. Bharat Dubey, Mr. AbhishekKaushik & Ms. Shubhlaxmi Dubey,Advs.
versus
THE STATE..... RespondentThrough:Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for theState with SI/Sumit Kumar, Spl. Cell,Janak Puri.Through:Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for theState with SI/Sumit Kumar, Spl. Cell,Janak Puri.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBAO R R%28.02.2019
Verificationreportfiled.Whiletheinvestigatingagencyhasconfirmed that the wife of the petitioner has to undergo surgery today, theobjection taken is that there are other relatives who may take care. Giventhe nature of the medical condition and the surgery in which context thepetitioner was granted interim bail for period of two weeks by order dated11.02.2019 by bail application no. 142/2019, it is deemed just and fair toallow the request for extension, particularly when the counsel for thepetitioner, on being asked, submitted that he requests for interim bail for sixweeks assuring and undertaking that no request for extension on any groundwhatsoever would be asked for.
BAIL APPLN. 509/2019
The interim bail is extended by six weeks from today subject to thesame conditions as were imposed in the order dated 11.02.2019, the bailbonds for which purpose will have to be furnished before the trial court.
Dasti, as prayed.
FEBRUARY 28, 2019nk
R.K.GAUBA, J
BAIL APPLN. 509/2019