CRL.M.C./224/2019 of ANUBHAV VERMA Vs USHA

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2019-01-17
Case number: 224/2019

Parties

ANUBHAV VERMA (PETITIONER)
USHA (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.REV.P./909/2022 of MANISH JAIN Vs USHA & ORS. (2024)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Conclusion

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 224/2019 & CRL.M.As.945-46/2019

ANUBHAV VERMA ..... Petitioner

Through: Ms. Ashu Arora, Adv. versus

USHA ..... Respondent

Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R R% 17.01.2019

CRL.M.A. 945/2019 (for exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 224/2019 & CRL.M.A.946/2019 (for stay)

1.Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments, submitted that she may be allowed to withdraw the petition with liberty that the observations made in the impugned orders dated 8.8.2018 and 5.1.2019 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate and the Appellate Court, respectively, shall not tantamount to any expression on the merits of the case while disposing of the main petition pending before the Trial Court.

2.Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. CRL.M.A.946/2019 is also dismissed as withdrawn.

3.It is clarified that the observations made in the impugned orders

dated 8.8.2018 and 5.1.2019 passed by the learned Metropolitan

Magistrate and the Appellate Court, respectively, shall not tantamount to any expression on the merits of the case while disposing of the main petition pending before the Trial Court.

4.The Trial Court is directed to decide the main petition, on the basis of evidence, documents proved on record and as per law as expeditiously as possible.

JANUARY 17, 2019/rk

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J