NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./332/2019 of KAILASH CHAND GUPTA Vs THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT DELHI)

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2019-01-22
Case number
332/2019

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (2)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+CRL.M.C. 332/2019 and Crl. M.A. no. 1433/2019

KAILASH CHAND GUPTA..... PetitionerThroughMr. Aditya Gaur, Adv.

versus

THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT DELHI)..... RespondentThroughMs. Manjeet Arya, APP

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%22.01.2019

By this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., petitioner has assailed theorder dated 10[th]November, 2017 passed by the learned MetropolitanMagistrate, Delhi whereby application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. of thepetitioner for recalling PW4 Dev Kalra for cross-examination has beendismissed.I have perused the impugned order and do not find anyperversity therein.It appears that PW4 was not cross-examined by thepetitioner’s counsel despite several opportunities granted to the petitioner.Opportunity of petitioner to cross-examine PW4 Dev Kalra was closed, videorder dated 7[th]January, 2015.An application under Section 311 Cr.P.C.was filed, which was allowed by the trial court, subject to payment of cost ofRs.5,000/- and PW4 Dev Kalra was recalled in the witness box.This

opportunity was again not availed, inasmuch as even cost was not paid.Accordingly, opportunity of petitioner to cross-examine PW4 was againclosed.

Petition is dismissed.Miscellaneous application is disposed of asinfructuous.

JANUARY 22, 2019r.bararia

A.K. PATHAK, J.