W.P.(CRL)/1476/2019 of MUNDER SINGH & ANR Vs THE STATE & ANR
Parties
- + W.P.(CRL) 1476/2019 and CRL.M.A. 10828/2019 (exemption) and CRL.M.A. 10829/2019 (delay) MUNDER SINGH & ANR (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Statutes cited (2)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 1476/2019 and CRL.M.A. 10828/2019 (exemption) and CRL.M.A. 10829/2019 (delay) MUNDER SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners CRL.M.A. 10829/2019 (delay) MUNDER SINGH & ANR ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. Kapil Lalwani, Advocate alongwith petitioners in person alongwith petitioners in person
versus
THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. R.S. Kundu, ASC with Mr. Tanuj Bhadana, Advocate for the Through: Mr. R.S. Kundu, ASC with Mr. Tanuj Bhadana, Advocate for the
State/Respondent No.1 with IO/SI
S.K.Jha, P.S.: Sarai Rohilla Mr.Manoj Ahuja, Advocate for Respondent no. 2 alongwith Respondent no.2 in person Mr.Manoj Ahuja, Advocate for Respondent no. 2 alongwith Respondent no.2 in person
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI O R R% 11.09.2019
The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No. 349/2012, under Sections 354/323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, registered at P.S.: Sarai Rohilla and the proceedings emanating therefrom.
The Investigating Officer, who is present in Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent no.2.
The petitioners and respondent no.2 submitted that they have amicably settled their disputes before the Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari, Delhi on 22.01.2019. As per the settlement, the parties have agreed to go
for quashing of this FIR, whereas another FIR No. 350/2012 under sections 323/341/420/34 IPC is compoundable and will be compounded before court concerned within 10 days from today.
Respondent no.2 reiterates the aforesaid facts and submits that they have amicably settled their dispute without any force or coercion. Respondent no.2 further submits that she has no objection if the FIR is quashed and the petition is allowed.
In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in the criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No. 349/2012, under Sections 354/323 of the IPC, registered at P.S.: Sarai Rohilla and the proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
Petition is disposed of accordingly.
SEPTEMBER 11, 2019
savita
BRIJESH SETHI, J