CRL.M.C./4068/2019 of SUMIT SHARMA Vs THE STATE & ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2019-12-23
Case number: 4068/2019

Parties

SUMIT SHARMA (PETITIONER)
THE STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 23.12.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 4068/2019

SUMIT SHARMA ..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Randhir Kumar, Adv. versus

THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. with Inspector Vijay Kumar Gupta, SI –Manmeet Singh, PS Nabi Karim –and SI Rajiv Gulati/IO, PS IGI Airport R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T (ORAL)

1.Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. –19/2013 registered at Police Station Nabi Karim and consequent

proceedings arising therefrom.

2.Notice issued.

3.Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.

4.With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for

final disposal.

5.The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 21.08.2006 as

per Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born out of the wedlock, namely,

Moksh. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.

6.The petitioner and respondent no. 2 with the intervention of their well

wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 20.07.2015 and settled all their disputes amicably.

7.The complainant is present in person and has been identified by SI -

–Rajiv Gulati of Police Station Nabi Karim. Respondent No. 2 submits that the matter has been settled and she has already received the settlement amount and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

8.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further. the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.

9.For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 19/2013 registered at –Police Station Nabi Karim and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

10.The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

Dasti.

DECEMBER 23, 2019/PB

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE