W.P.(C)/4872/2018 of SH. UTTAM KUMAR Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Parties
- SH. UTTAM KUMAR (PETITIONER)
- UNION OF INDIA AND ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 4872/2018
SH. UTTAM KUMAR
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar for Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Vivekanand Mishra with Mr. R.M. Tripathi, Mr. Vipul Agarwal, Advs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R R% 08.05.2019
The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition to seek the quashing of the order dated 22.11.2017 along with order dated 03.10.2017, whereby the offer of appointment made to the petitioner was cancelled. He also assails the order dated 16.01.2018 passed on the petitioner’s –representation rejecting the same. He seeks direction that the offer of appointment made to him dated 30.03.2017 for the post of CT/ GD in SSC be restored and the petitioner be allowed to join the said post with all consequential benefits.
The petitioner’s candidature was cancelled since it was found in forensic examination that the thumb impression taken in the admission certificate at the concerned examination venue during written examination on 04.10.2015
was different from specimen left thumb impression of the petitioner taken during his identity verification on 03.06.2016.
Pertinently, the petitioner has not assailed the CFSL Report in these proceedings, and rightly so. Unless the petitioner assails the said report in appropriate proceedings, reliance placed on the said CFSL Report cannot be faulted. We, therefore, dismiss this petition, leaving it open to the petitioner to assail the said Report in the appropriate proceedings, if the petitioner is so advised.
The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
MAY 08, 2019 N.Khanna
REKHA PALLI, J