CRL.M.C./5017/2019 of MANISH AGGARWAL Vs THE STATE & ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2019-09-30
Case number: 5017/2019

Parties

MANISH AGGARWAL (PETITIONER)
THE STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Conclusion

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 30.09.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 5017/2019

MANISH AGGARWAL ..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. M. Gupta, Adv.

versus

THE STATE & ANR ..... Respondents

Through:

Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for

State

Ms. Geetanksha Dhingra, Adv. for R-

W/ASI Neeraj, PS Dabari

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T (ORAL)

CRL.M.A. 37353/2019

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.A. 37354/2019

3.In view of the reasons stated in the present application, the delay in

filing the petition is allowed.

CRL.M.C. 5017/2019

4.Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.

389/2013 dated17.07.2013 registered at Police Station Dabri and

consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

5.Notice issued.

6.Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2.

7.With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

8.The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 19.02.2003 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioner and respondent no.2, they have started living separately from 06.07.2012.

9.The petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 01.01.2016 and settled all their disputes amicably.

10.The complainant is present in person with her learned counsel and has been identified W/ASI Neeraj of Police Station Dabri and submits that the matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

11.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.

12.For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.389/2013 dated17.07.2013 registered at Police Station Dabri and consequent proceedings

emanating therefrom are quashed.

13.The petition is allowed accordingly.

14.Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master.

SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 ms

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE