CRL.M.C./50/2019 of PAWAN KUMAR SISODIA @ MONU Vs THE STATE & ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2019-01-09
Case number: 50/2019

Parties

+ CRL.M.C. 50/2019 PAWAN KUMAR SISODIA @ MONU (PETITIONER)
THE STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

TEST.CAS./31/2003 of MOHINDER SINGH Vs THE STATE AC+ (2017)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 50/2019PAWAN KUMAR SISODIA @ MONU..... PetitionerPAWAN KUMAR SISODIA @ MONU..... Petitioner

..... PetitionerThrough:Ms.SimantiniPaul,Mr.ManishMalik, Mr. Dinesh Madesiya and Mr.Jai Subhash Thakur, Advs.Malik, Mr. Dinesh Madesiya and Mr.Jai Subhash Thakur, Advs.

versus

THE STATE & ANR..... RespondentsThrough:Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for Statewith SI Bijender, P.S. Shalimar Bagh.Respondent no.2 in person.Through:Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for Statewith SI Bijender, P.S. Shalimar Bagh.Respondent no.2 in person.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%09.01.2019

It is submitted that quarrel took place between the petitioner andrespondent no.2 wherein respondent no. 2 sustained simple injuries. Thisincident had led to registration of FIR No. 214/2016 under Section 307 IPCat police station Shalimar Bagh, on the complaint of respondent no.2. It isfurther submitted that petitioner and respondent no.2 have now settled theirdisputes amicably vide Compromise Deed dated 20.09.2018, therefore,aforesaid FIR may be quashed. Respondent no.2 is present in Court and hasbeen identified by SI Bijender of police station Shalimar Bagh. He submitsthat he has settled the matter with petitioner of his own free will and withoutany undue force, pressure or coercion and has no objection in case the

aforesaid FIR is quashed.

Keeping in view that petitioner and respondent no.2 are neighboursand quarrel ensued between them on some trivial issue wherein respondentno.2 had sustained simple injuries and now that they have amicably settledtheir disputes in order to maintain harmonious relations, I am of the viewthat no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping them entangled incriminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, aforesaid FIRand the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applicationis disposed of as infructuous.

Dasti.

JANUARY 09, 2019ga

A.K. PATHAK, J.