CRL.M.C./5669/2019 of SUMEET DOONGA & ORS Vs THE STATE & ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2019-11-06
Case number: 5669/2019

Parties

SUMEET DOONGA & ORS (PETITIONER)
THE STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

TEST.CAS./31/2003 of MOHINDER SINGH Vs THE STATE AC+ (2017)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 06.11.2019

CRL.M.C. 5669/2019

SUMEET DOONGA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. Ravi Bhargava with Ms. Priya Gupta, Advs.

versus

THE STATE & ANR

..... Respondents

Through Mr. K.K. Ghei, APP for State Mr. S. G. Asthana, Adv. for R-2 with respondent no.2 in person SI Jogdeep Malik, PS Jagat Puri Mr. S. G. Asthana, Adv. for R-2 with respondent no.2 in person SI Jogdeep Malik, PS Jagat Puri

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T (ORAL)

Crl. M.A. 39786/2019

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.5669/2019

3.Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.

406/2014 dated 04.07.2014 registered at Police Station Jagat Puri and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4.Notice issued.

5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6.The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 14.11.2010 as

per Hindu rites and rituals. One female child was born out of the wedlock namely Kumar Bani. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 15.05.2014.

7.The petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide memorandum of settlement dated 22.04.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.

8.The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by SI Jagdip Malik of Police Station Jagat Puri and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

10.For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 406/2014 dated 04.07.2014 registered at Police Station Jagat Puri and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11.The petition is allowed accordingly.

12.Order dasti.

NOVEMBER 06, 2019

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE