CRL.M.C./6000/2019 of RAVINDER & ANR Vs THE STATE & ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2019-11-25
Case number: 6000/2019

Parties

RAVINDER & ANR (PETITIONER)
THE STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

TEST.CAS./31/2003 of MOHINDER SINGH Vs THE STATE AC+ (2017)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 25.11.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 6000/2019

RAVINDER & ANR

..... Petitioner

Through Ms. Sakhi Sachdeva with Mr. Akshay Kumar, Advs. Kumar, Advs.

versus

THE STATE & ANR

..... Respondents

Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State Respondent no.2 in person ASI Jitender, PS Kanjhawala Respondent no.2 in person ASI Jitender, PS Kanjhawala

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T (ORAL)

Crl. M.A. 41085/2019

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.6000/2019

3.Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR

No.109/2012 dated 21.05.2012 registered at Police Station Kanjhawala and

consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4.Notice issued.

5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for the and with the consent of the

counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6.The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 24.03.2010 as

per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 21.04.2010.

7.The petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts on 22.12.2015 and settled all their disputes amicably.

8.The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by ASI Jitender of Police Station Kanjhawala and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

10.For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.109/2012 dated 21.05.2012 registered at Police Station Kanjhawala and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11.The petition is allowed accordingly.

12.Order dasti

NOVEMBMER 25, 2019 ms

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE