W.P.(C)/613/2019 of MR. HASAN AGHA AND ANR. Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
Parties
- MR HASAN AGHA AND ANR (PETITIONER)
- UNION OF INDIA & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (4)
Statutes cited (11)
- code of criminal procedure, 173 (1973)
- code of criminal procedure, 482 (1973)
- indian penal code, 498a (1860)
- code of criminal procedure, 482 (1973)
- code of criminal procedure, 482 (1973)
- indian penal code, 307 (1860)
- indian penal code (1860)
- code of criminal procedure (1973)
- code of criminal procedure (1973)
- constitution of india (1950)
- indian penal code (1860)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI104
+ W.P.(C) 613/2019 & CM 2844/2019
MR HASAN AGHA AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr Waqar A. Khan, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr Yeeshu Jain and Ms Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates for LAC/L&B. Mr Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr Sunil Kumar Jha and Mr M.S. Akhtar, Advocates for DMRC.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R R% 21.01.2019
CM 2845/2019 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 613/2019 & CM 2844/2019
2. This petition relates to the acquisition of land on which an entire unauthorized colony is located.
3. Admittedly, the provisional certificate of regularization for the said unauthorized colony has been issued. Copy of the said certificate has also been enclosed with the petition.
4. Apart from the fact that the Petitioners are seeking quashing of the land acquisition proceedings in which the Award was passed way back in 1992,
which prayer is obviously barred by laches. The prayer is any way not tenable in view of the decision dated 10[th] January, 2018 in W.P. (C) 3623/2018 (Akhil Sibal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi)and the decision dated 17[th] January, 2019 in (Mool Chand v. Union of India).
5. At this stage, learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
6. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. The pending application is also dismissed.
7. The dismissal of the writ petition will not come in the way of the Petitioner pursuing their case for regularization of the unauthorized colony in question.
S. MURALIDHAR, J.
JANUARY 21, 2019
SANJEEV NARULA, J.