CRL.M.C./6216/2019 of ANUJ GHAIAND & ORS Vs STATE & ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2019-12-04
Case number: 6216/2019

Parties

ANUJ GHAIAND & ORS (PETITIONER)
STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.M.C./853/2017 of NITISH KUMAR Vs STATE & ORS. (2018)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 04.12.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 6216/2019

ANUJ GHAIAND & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Saran Suri, Mr. Roshan Kumar and Mr. Shobhit Chandra Sharma, Advs. Through: Mr. Saran Suri, Mr. Roshan Kumar and Mr. Shobhit Chandra Sharma, Advs.

versus

STATE & ANR

..... Respondents

Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with Inspector Virender Dalal, SHO/ Malviya Nagar and SI Deepak –with Inspector Virender Dalal, SHO/ Malviya Nagar and SI Deepak –Tanwar, PS Malviya Nagar R-2 in person R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T (ORAL)

CRL. M.A. 41827/2019

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 and CRL.M.A. 41826/2019

3.Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby –quashing FIR No. 609/2016 dated 28.07.2016, registered at Police StationMalviya Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

4.Notice issued.

5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.

6.With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

7.The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 18.11.2001 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Two children were born out of the wedlock namely, Meagan and Kiaan.

8.Respondent No. 2 is personally present in Court and has been identified by Inspector Virender Dalal, SHO/IO, Police Station-Malviya Nagar and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9.The petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deeds dated 21.05.2019 and 24.05.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.

10.Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the present petition may be allowed in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

11.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

CRL.M.C. 6216/2019

12.For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.609/2016 dated –28.07.2016, registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

13.The petition is allowed accordingly.

Dasti.

DECEMBER 04, 2019 PB

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE

CRL.M.C. 6216/2019