NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted) — Search

W.P.(C)/6564/2019 of MRS. MADHURI GUPTA Vs EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2019-06-03
Bench
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DELHI, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION DELHI ACCORDINGLY
Case number
6564/2019

Parties

Cites (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6564/2019 & CM Appl.27738/2019

MRS. MADHURI GUPTA

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Ankit Jain and Ms. Alka Chojar, Advs.

versus

EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

& ANR.

.... Respondents

Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, ASC and

Mr. Shivam Chhalotre, Adv. for R-1

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R R% 03.06.2019

1. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that he has received telephonic instructions only today that the Appellate Tribunal, Municipal Corporation Delhi has been conferred with the powers to consider the application of the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the appeal is pending before the Appellate Tribunal, Municipal Corporation Delhi and the application for the interim relief is also pending.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that in view of the aforesaid submissions, the Appellate Tribunal, Municipal Corporation Delhi may be directed to consider the application of the petitioner immediately preferably by tomorrow itself, i.e. on 4.6.2019, when the appeal is coming up for hearing before the Appellate

Tribunal, Municipal Corporation Delhi. Accordingly, the Appellate Tribunal, Municipal Corporation Delhi is directed to consider the application of the petitioner tomorrow itself and pass appropriate orders.

4. Meanwhile, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner till 4.6.2019 and the Appellate Tribunal, Municipal Corporation Delhi shall pass appropriate orders on the application of the petitioner tomorrow itself, i.e. 4.6.2019.

5. In view of the aforesaid directions, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be allowed to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application is also dismissed as withdrawn.

Dasti.

JUNE 03, 2019/rk

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J (VACATION JUDGE)