CRL.M.C./6696/2019 of MOHD. NASIR & ANR Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2019-12-23
Case number: 6696/2019

Parties

MOHD. NASIR & ANR (PETITIONER)
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

TEST.CAS./31/2003 of MOHINDER SINGH Vs THE STATE AC+ (2017)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 23.12.2019

+ CRL.M.C. 6696/2019

MOHD. NASIR & ANR

..... Petitioners

Through: Mr. L.P. Singh and Mr. Gulshan, Advs.

versus

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR

..... Respondents Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State –with Inspector Rajnikant, PS Khajuri Khas R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T (ORAL)

CRL. M.A. 43467/2019

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 6696/2019

3.Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. –74/2013 registered at Police Station Khajuri Khas, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4.Notice issued.

5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.

6.Respondent No. 2 is present in person.

7.With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. final disposal.

8.The petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 got married on 02.12.2010

as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no. 2, they started living separately from 10.10.2012.

9.The petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 21.02.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.

10.The complainant/respondent no. 2 is present in person. Original Aadhaar Card (bearing No. [REDACTED]) of respondent No. 2 is seen and returned. She submits that the matter has been settled and she has received the full and final settlement amount and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

11.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

12.For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 74/2013 registered at –Police Station Khajuri Khas, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.

13.The petition is allowed accordingly.

Dasti.

DECEMBER 23, 2019 PB

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE