NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./6722/2019 of SHASHIKANT & ANR Vs STATE & ANR.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2019-12-24
Bench
FAMILY COURT
Case number
6722/2019

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 24.12.2019

CRL.M.C. 6722/2019

SHASHIKANT & ANR

..... Petitioners

Through: Mr.Mahesh Prasad, Adv. with Mr.Alok K. Prasad & Mr.Naresh Kumar, Advs.

versus

STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents

Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. ASI Ghanshyam Das PS CWC Nanak Pura. ASI Ghanshyam Das PS CWC Nanak Pura.

Mr.Pushp Saini, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. 2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T (ORAL)

Crl. M.A. 43570/2019

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 6722/2019

3.Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.60/2017 dated 07.06.2017 registered at Police Station CWC Nanak Pura

instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the

IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4.Notice issued.

5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the

respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6.The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 23.05.2005 as

per Hindu rites and rituals. One female child was born out of the wedlock namely Hiyanshi. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.

7.The petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before Counselling Cell, Family Court, Patiala House vide settlement deed dated 01.08.2018 and settled all their disputes amicably.

8.The total settlement amount is ₹8,00,000/-(Rupees Eight Lakhs only).

It is submitted that the respondent No. 2 has already received an amount of ₹5 lakhs (Rupees Five Lakhs only). demand draft bearing No.696443dated 21.12.2019 for the balance amount of ₹3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs only) is handed over to the respondent No. 2 today in the Court.

9.The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been

identified by ASI Ghanshyam Das and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further. and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

10.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash

the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. petitioners any further.

11.For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.60/2017 dated 07.06.2017 registered at Police Station CWC Nanak Pura instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

12.The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

13.Order dasti

DECEMBER 24, 2019

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT)

JUDGE