LPA/624/2019 of GOURI DEVI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE & HOSPITAL Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR
Parties
- GOURI DEVI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE & HOSPITAL (PETITIONER)
- UNION OF INDIA & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (0 resolved of 3 detected)
3 case citations detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 23.10.2019
+ LPA 624/2019 & CM No.42459/2019 (for stay)
GOURI DEVI INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE & HOSPITAL
..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Vivek Sarin, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Rajesh Gogna, Adv. for R-1/UOI. Mr.Vikas Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr.T. Singhdev, Adv., Mr.Tarun Verma, Adv., Ms.Puja Sarkar, Adv., Mr.Arunima Pal, Adv. & Ms.Biakthansanghi Das, Adv. for R- 2/MCI.
CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT
D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL)
1.This Letters Patent Appeal has been preferred by the original petitioner whose writ petition i.e. WP(C) No.6898/2019, was dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide judgment and order dated 30[th] August, 2019 (Annexure A-1 to the memo of this LPA) whereby the prayer of this appellant (original petitioner), for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 18[th] May, 2019 passed by the
LPA No.624/2019 Page 1 of 12
respondent no.2-the Board of Governors in supersession of Medical Council of India (Annexure A-7 to the memo of this LPA) was not accepted by the said Board. As the original petition was dismissed, the original petitioner has preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal.
2. Having heard counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, it appears that this appellant is running an Institution imparting medical education from the year 2016-17. The first batch of students was allowed to be admitted for the academic year 2016-17 whereas for the academic year 2017-2018 and for the academic year 2018-2019, no students were allowed by the Medical Council of India to be admitted with this appellant-Institution. The intake capacity of the appellant-Institution was 150. The first batch of the students has reached the fourth academic year. 3. It appears from the facts of the case that the Medical Council of India (MCI) has carried out inspection of this institution on 26[th]/27[th]November, 2018 for the academic year 2019-2020 and another inspection was also carried out on 8[th] April, 2019.
4. It appears from the facts of the case that there are several deficiencies found out with this appellant-Institution. Originally, there were fourteen deficiencies pointed out by the respondents and they are as under:-
“1. Out of UG accommodation for 360, accommodation available for 210, deficient by 150. For Residents 100% deficiency of accommodation. available for 210, deficient by 150. For Residents 100% deficiency of accommodation.
2. Residential quarters for non-teaching staff 100% deficient. deficient.
3. Audiometry and speech therapy-not available.
LPA No.624/2019 Page 2 of 12
4. Pantry and store room not in use for all clinical wards. wards.
5. Bed Occupancy is 30.5%).
6. Normal deliveries and Caesarian - Nil.
7. Ba & IVP-Nil in OPD.
8. USG machines not available in causality.
9. Bed occupancy in septic labour room and eclampsia room is nil. room is nil.
10. In Path, Museum mounted specimen only 40 against 300 (260 short) un-mounted only 30, against 150 (120 short). 300 (260 short) un-mounted only 30, against 150 (120 short).
11. No cold chain equipment, no accommodation in RHTC. RHTC.
12. Deficiency of Faculty by 51% (67/117).
13. Deficiency of Resident by 100%) (66/66).
14. Other deficiencies as pointed out in the assessment report.”report.”
5. Thereafter, again the inspection was carried out on 8[th] April,
2019 and there were three deficiencies pointed out to the appellant which are as under:-
"1. Faculty Deficiency of 18.8%
2. Residents Deficiency of 21.2% Bed occupancy - 74.8%."Bed occupancy - 74.8%."
6. Thereafter opportunity of being heard was given to the appellant and later on an order dated 18[th] May, 2019 (Annexure A-7 to the memo of this LPA) was passed by the respondents and the appellant was not granted permission for renewal of fourth batch (150 MBBS students) for the academic year 2019-2020.
7. The appellant challenged the aforesaid decision of the MCI dated 18[th] May, 2019 (Annexure A-7 to the memo of this LPA) on various grounds including the ground that different are the parameters of the respondents for different medical colleges. The appellant has
LPA No.624/2019 Page 3 of 12
not waived his fundamental rights and the deficiencies which are pointed out are in fact miscalculated deficiencies which is mainly on the strength of 450 students and not on the basis of 150 students.
8. We have heard the counsel for both sides at length and looking to the deficiencies pointed out by the Medical Council of India, the requirement as per MCI are as under:-
9. As per the appellant, they are already having several faculty members and resident doctors and they are as under:-
10. We have perused the requirement as pointed out by the MCI and also looking to the provisions of Section 10A of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 especially Section 10(2)(a) to be read with Section 10(7) of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, and also looking to the fact that this appellant has to present composite
LPA No.624/2019 Page 4 of 12
scheme for all the years before the respondent/Medical Council of India year after year, the students are going in the next year of study, hence, if the first batch has reached to the fourth year, all the faculty members are required with this appellant. It cannot be said that the faculty members who are present in the first academic year, are in proportionate with 150 students and, therefore, no additional faculty members are required. It ought to be kept in mind that year after year in the study of MBBS course, more subjects are required to be taught. Consequently, for the clinical subjects, there is requirement of laboratory and other requirements for which also more faculty members for the next academic years are also required and hence always composite requirements are to be given by this appellant for the faculty members as well as for the resident doctors. Hence, the contention raised by the counsel for the appellant (original petitioner) that the requirement should be calculated of the faculty members and residents only on the basis of the 150 students, is not accepted by this Court. If the first batch has reached to fourth year, then all the faculty members and residents as pointed out by the Medical Council of India, ought to have been employed by this appellant. Thus, the requirement of the faculty members and residents cannot be calculated only on the basis of 150 students but it ought to be calculated on the basis of all the years requirement, the faculty members and residents must be available. This aspect of the matter has been properly appreciated by the Medical Council of India while passing an order dated 18[th] May, 2019 (Annexure 7) as well as this aspect has been properly appreciated by the learned Single Judge
LPA No.624/2019 Page 5 of 12
while deciding writ petition preferred by the appellant i.e. WP(C) No.6898/2019 vide judgment and order dated 30[th] August, 2019. The submission sought to be canvassed by Mr.Sarin is essentially, that, as no intake of students was permitted for the academic years 2017-18 & 2018-19, the academic year 2019-20 should be treated as the second batch and not the fourth batch. We are unable to agree. In advancing this submission, the he ignores two facts, viz. that (i) the batch of students admitted in 2016-17 are in its fourth year in 2019-20, and (ii) the approval granted to the appellant, in 2016-17, was to scheme,and not to batch. This scheme was composite, covering five years, and required incremental enhancement of facilities and equipment. The appellant having failed to comply, no fault can be found with the decision of the MCI.
12. We are in full agreement with the reasons given by the learned Single Judge in the judgment and order dated 30[th] August, 2019. We see no reason to take any other view than what has been taken by the learned Single Judge and there is no substance in the appeal and the same is dismissed.
13. Even otherwise also, the cut-off date for the academic year 2019-20 for getting such type of permission, has also been over. The said cut-off date is 30[th] May, 2019 as per the decision rendered by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Ashish Ranjan & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., (2016) 11 SCC 225 in the tables incorporated at pages 226-227, 227-228 and 228-229 of the decision as under :
―TIME SCHEDULE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATIONS FOR
ESTABLISHMENT OF NEW MEDICAL
LPA No.624/2019 Page 6 of 12
COLLEGES/RENEWAL OF PERMISSION AND PROCESSING OF THE APPLICATIONS BY THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA
LPA No.624/2019 Page 7 of 12
5.Final recommendations for the By 30[th] April letter of permission by the Medical Council of India. 6.Issue of letter of permission by By 31[st] May the Central Government.
–Note 1. In case of renewal of permission, the applicants shall submit the application to the Medical Council of India by 15[th] July.
TIME SCHEDULE FOR RECEIPT OF APPLICATIONS FOR INCREASE OF ADMISSION CAPACITY IN MBBS COURSE/RENEWAL OF PERMISSION FOR INCREASE OF SEATS AND PROCESSING OF THE APPLICATIONS BY THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND THE MEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA
Sl. Stage of processing Last date No.1. Receipt of applications by Between 15[th]the Central Government. June to 7[th] July (both days inclusive) of any year 2. Forwarding application by By 15[th] July the Central Government to the Medical Council of India. 3. Technical scrutiny, By 15[th]
LPA No.624/2019 Page 8 of 12
—Note 1.In case of renewal of permission, the applicants shall submit the application to the Medical Council of India by 15[th] July.
TIME SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF THE ADMISSION PROCESS FOR FIRST MBBS COURSE
LPA No.624/2019 Page 9 of 12
Sl. Schedule for Seats to be filled Seats to be Nos. admission up by the filled up by Central the State Government Governmentthrough the All /Institution India Entrance Examination 1.Conduct of Between 1[st] to 7[th]Between entrance May 10[th] to 17[th]examination May 2.Declaration of By 1[st] June By 1[st] June the result of the qualifying exam/entrance exam 3.1[st]round of To be over by Between 6[th]counselling/ 25[th] June July to 15[th]admission July 4.Last date for By 5[th] July By 22[nd] July joining the allotted college and the course. 5.2[nd]round of Between 23[rd]Between counselling/ July to 30[th] July 10[th] to 22[nd]admission for August
LPA No.624/2019 Page 10 of 12
–Note 1. All India quota seats remaining vacant after last date for joining i.e. 9[th] August will be deemed to be converted into State quota.
2. Institute/college/courses permitted after 31[st] May will not be considered for admission/allotment of seats for current academic year.
3. In any circumstances, last date of admission/joining will not be extended after 31[st]August.‖
14. Both the cut-off date for granting permission which is 31[st] May, 2019, have gone and for admission of the students i.e. 31[st] August, 2019 has also gone. The prayer in the writ petition of the petitioner, as also the communication dated 18[th] May, 2019 impugned in the writ
LPA No.624/2019 Page 11 of 12
petition, are specific to the academic year 2019-2020. The writ petition has, therefore, effectively been rendered infructuous. Hence also, we see no reason to entertain this Letters Patent Appeal. Hence, there is no substance in the in the LPA which is hereby dismissed.
CM No. 42459/2019 (for stay)
1. In view of the dismissal of the appeal, this application also stands dismissed.
OCTOBER 23, 2019/aa
THE CHIEF JUSTICE, J
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
LPA No.624/2019 Page 12 of 12