NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.REV.P./603/2019 of ROHIT Vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI)

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2019-12-10
Case number
71 of 2017

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (3)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Section

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 603/2019 ROHIT ..... Petitioner

Through Mr. Dharm Vir Singh, Adv. versus

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Amit Chadha, APP

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R R10.12.2019

1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 401 read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for setting aside the order on charge dated 25.1.2019 passed by Special Judge (NDPS)-1, Central District, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi in case FIR bearing No.71/2017, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), registered at PS: Sarai Rohilla whereby the charge under Section 302 of the IPC was framed against the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the impugned order dated 25.1.2019 is bereft of any reasoning and prayed that the matter may be remanded back.

3. Learned APP, on the query of the Court, also submitted that the matter may be remanded back.

4. I have gone through the impugned order dated 25.1.2019 and

found that except the three lines, just to complete the formalities that prima-facie case is made out against the petitioner, it contains nothing. It seems that the Trial Court has neither applied its mind nor has given any prima-facie reason to come to the conclusion as to how the charge under section 302 of the IPC is made out against the petitioner.

5. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 25.1.2019 on the point of charge is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Trial Court. The Trial Court is directed to re-hear the arguments on the point of charge on the next date of hearing, i.e. 31.1.2020, before it and pass the appropriate order in accordance with law.

6. Revision petition is disposed of in the above terms.

DECEMBER 10, 2019/rk

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J