W.P.(CRL)/3092/2018 of SURINDER KUMAR SHARMA & ANR. Vs STATE & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2019-08-14
Bench: MUKTA GUPTA

Parties

Represented by: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Choudhary, Mr.B.K. Choudhary, Advs.B.K. Choudhary, Advs (PETITIONER)
STATE & (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)

CRL.M.C./853/2017 of NITISH KUMAR Vs STATE & ORS. (2018)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

$-24 tQ 26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(CRL) 3012/2018 & Crl.M.A. 33421/2018MRS. KANUPRIYA PetitionerMRS. KANUPRIYA Petitioner

Represented by: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Choudhary, Mr.B.K. Choudhary, Advs.B.K. Choudhary, Advs.

versus

STATE &

ORS.

Respondent

Represented by: Ms. Saloni Jain, proxy Adv. for Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for State.Richa Kapoor, ASC for State.

+W.P.(CRL) 3063/2018 & Crl.M.A. 33787/2018TUSHARANSHU SHARMA TUSHARANSHU SHARMA

Petitioner

Represented by: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Choudhary, Mr.B.K. Choudhary, Advs.B.K. Choudhary, Advs.

versus

STATE &

ORS. RespondentRepresented by: Mr. Piyush Singhal, proxy Adv. forMr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State.Represented by: Mr. Piyush Singhal, proxy Adv. forMr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASC for State.

+W.P.(CRL) 3092/2018 & Crl.M.A. 33793/2018SURINDER KUMAR SHARMA & ANR. PetitionerRepresented by: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Choudhary, Mr.B.K. Choudhary, Advs.SURINDER KUMAR SHARMA & ANR. PetitionerRepresented by: Mr. Abhishek Kumar Choudhary, Mr.B.K. Choudhary, Advs.

versus

Respondent

STATE & ORS.

Represented by:Ms. Saloni Jain, proxy Adv. for Ms.Richa Kapoor, ASC for State.Richa Kapoor, ASC for State.

W.P.(CRL) 3012/2018 & conn, matters

page 1 of 2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

ORDER%14.08.2019

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw thepetitions and applications for the reason parties have settled the matter anddivorce by mutual consent has been granted between petitioner inW.P.(CRL) 3063/2018 and respondent No.3, with liberty to file freshpetition seeking quashing of the FIR in question on the basis of compromise.Leave and liberty granted.

Petitions and applications are dismissed as withdrawn.

AUGUST 14, 2019'ga'

lUKTA GUPTA, J.

W.P.(CRL) 3012/2018 & conn, matters