BAIL APPLN./2491/2020 of SUDHIR KUMAR Vs STATE OF DELHI (NCT OF DELHI)

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2020-09-03
Case number: 145 of 2020

Parties

Mr. S.N. Shukla, Advs (PETITIONER)
STATE OF DELHI (NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.M.C./1404/2012 of B C SHARMA & ANR Vs STATE OF DELHI & ANR (2017)

Statutes cited (2)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2491/2020

SUDHIR KUMAR

..... Petitioner

Through Mr. Amrendra Kumar Jha and

Mr. S.N. Shukla, Advs.

versus

STATE OF DELHI (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State

Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R R

% 03.09.2020

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

Crl. M.A.12122/2020 (Exemption)

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 2491/2020

3.The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No.145/2020, for the offences punishable under Sections 341/323/354/354-A/506/509/427/34 IPC, registered at PS Aman Vihar, Delhi.

4.Notice issued.

5.Learned APP for the State accepts notice.

6.Learned APP has fairly conceded that the petitioner is similarly situated as the other co-accused have already been granted bail vide orders dated 21.08.2020, 24.08.2020 and 02.09.2020. as the other co-accused have already been granted bail vide orders dated 21.08.2020, 24.08.2020 and 02.09.2020.

7.Accordingly, on parity, I am of the view that the petitioner deserves

anticipatory bail.

8.Accordingly, the SHO/IO concerned is hereby directed that in the event of arrest, the petitioner/applicant shall be released on his furnishing personal bond in the sum Rs.20,000/-.

9.The petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation and make himself available for interrogation by police officer, as and when required.

10.Before parting with the order, it is relevant to mention that nothing contained in this order shall be construed as an expression on the merits of the case.

11.The present petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

12.Copy of this order be transmitted to SHO/IO concerned for necessary

compliance.

13.The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

SEPTEMBER 03, 2020/rk

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J