BAIL APPLN./1262/2020 of TUSHAR Vs THE STATE
Parties
- + BAIL APPLN. 1262/2020 TUSHAR (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (RESPONDENT)
Cites (2)
- CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)
- AIR 2017 SC 4843 (2017) DISTINGUISHED
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1262/2020 TUSHAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ravin Rao, Adv. TUSHAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ravin Rao, Adv.
versus
THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State. Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for the State.
W/SI Dinesh Kumari, PS Rani Bagh. Mr.Akshit Sawal, Adv. for complainant.Mr.Akshit Sawal, Adv. for complainant.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R R
% 26.08.2020
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
1.In view of order passed today i.e. on 26.08.2020 in Crl.M.C.1515/2020, present petition has become infructuous.
2.The same is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
3.The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through email.
AUGUST 26, 2020/ab
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J