W.P.(CRL)/1732/2020 of MOHD. FARHAN Vs THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2020-10-20
Case number: 16 of 2020

Parties

MOHD. FARHAN (PETITIONER)
THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.L.P./602/2022 of MS SACHDEVA ENTERPRISES Vs THE STATE AND ANR (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 20.10.2020

+ W.P.(CRL) 1732/2020

MOHD. FARHAN

..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sushil Kumar, Adv.

versus

THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents

Through Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms. Jyoti Babbar SI Pawan, PS Chandni Mahal Respondent no.2 in person through VC

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T(ORAL)

Crl. M.A. 14527/2020

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 1732/2020

3.Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction for quashing of

FIR No. 16/2020 dated 27.01.2020 registered at Police Station Chandni Mahal and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

4.Notice issued.

5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and respondent no.2 present in person through VC and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6.Petitioner and respondent no.2 got married on 07.10.2009 as per

Muslim Personal Law (Shariat). Three children were born out of the said

wedlock, one of them passed away. Extreme incompatibilities led to registration of present FIR.

7.Petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement and settled all their disputes amicably. wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement and settled all their disputes amicably.

8.Complainant/respondent no.2 is present in person and has been identified by SI Pawan of Police Station Chandni Mahal and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.

10.For the reasons afore-recorded, 16/2020 dated 27.01.2020 registered at Police Station Chandni Mahal and entire criminal proceedings emanating

therefrom are quashed.

11.The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

12.The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

OCTOBER 20, 2020

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE