NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./2028/2020 of INDERJIT KALSI Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2020-10-20
Bench
DELHI
Case number
2028/2020

Parties

Cites (1)

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 20[th] October, 2020

+ CRL.M.C. 2028/2020

INDERJIT KALSI ..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Anish Dhindra, Adv.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State with SI Dinesh, PS Kalkaji.

Respondent No.2 in person

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T(ORAL)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1.Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.154/2017 dated 20.4.2017 u/s 406/498A/34 IPC, –registered at PS Kalkaji, Delhi and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

2.Notice issued.

3.Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent No.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up

CRL.M.C. 2028/2020

for final disposal.

4.The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent No.2has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

5.Petitioner and Respondent No. 2 got married on 04.2.2013 as per Sikh

rituals and ceremonies. Due to temperamental issues arose between the

parties, as per the claim of respondent No.2, parties started living separately

from 23.9.2016, however, as per petitioner they started living separately from 1.12.2016.

6.Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court for hearing through video conferencing, who has been identified by SI Dinesh, submits that the matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

7.Petitioner and respondent No.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 21.10.2019

8.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioner any further.

9.For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.154/2017 dated 20.4.2017 u/s

–406/498A/34 IPC, registered at PS Kalkaji, Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

10.The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

11.The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

OCTOBER 20, 2020/vp/rk

SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J