NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./2124/2020 of SH. SACHIN RATHORE & ORS. Vs THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2020-11-05
Bench
FAMILY COURTS, NEW DELHI, WEST
Case number
2124/2020

Parties

Cites (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 5[th] November, 2020

+ CRL.M.C. 2124/2020

SH. SACHIN RATHORE & ORS.

.... Petitioners

Through Mr. Kapil Kumar, Adv.

versus

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .... Respondents Through Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the Statewith ASI Ramji Lal, PS Paschim Vihar West Complainant in person

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T(ORAL)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

CRL. M.A.15151/2020

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C.2124/2020

3.Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction thereby for quashing of FIR No.0251/2019 dated 05.06.2019, registered at PS – Paschim Vihar West, New Delhi and all other proceedings arising

therefrom.

4.Notice issued.

5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent No.2 and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6.Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 got married on 12.05.2013 as per Hindu rites and rituals. They started living separately from 11.10.2018.

7.Petitioners and respondent No.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, West, THC, Delhi vide settlement deed dated 19.07.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.

8.Complainant is present in person and has been identified by ASI Ramji Lal/IO and submits that matter has been settled. She further submits that she has been living happily with the petitioner No.1 and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.

10.For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.0251/2019 dated 05.06.2019,

registered at PS – Paschim Vihar West, New Delhi and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11.The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

12.The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

NOVEMBER 05, 2020/rk

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE