NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.M.C./572/2020 of ROMA SACHDEVA Vs THE STATE & ANR

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2020-02-20
Case number
572/2020

Parties

Cites (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision:20.02.2020

+ CRL.M.C. 572/2020 ROMA SACHDEVA

..... Petitioner

Through Mr. Mohit Bangwal, Adv.

versus

THE STATE & ANR

..... Respondent

Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. Head Constable Krishan Mr. Abhiesumat Gupta, Adv. for respondent with respondent in person Head Constable Krishan Mr. Abhiesumat Gupta, Adv. for respondent with respondent in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

J U M N T (ORAL)

CRL. M.A. 2358/2020

1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.Application is disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 572/2020

3.Vide the present petition, petitioner seeks direction thereby for quashing of FIR No. 71/2017 dated 11.02.2017, registered at PS Katju Marg and all other proceedings arising therefrom.

4.Notice issued.

5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and counsel for

respondent no.2 who is present in person and with the consent of counsel for parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6.The present petition is filed on the ground that parties have settled their disputes and respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

7.Respondent no2. is personally present in Court with he has been identified by ASI Krishan /IO and submits that matter has been settled and he does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

8.Petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 02.12.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.

9.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioner any further.

10.For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No. 71/2017 dated 11.02.2017,

registered at PS Katju Marg and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

11.The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.

12.Order dasti.

FEBRUARY 20, 2020 /ms

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE

CRL.M.C. 572/2020