W.P.(C)/6083/2020 of HIMANSHU ARORA Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Parties
- + W.P.(C) 6083/2020 & CM 21872/2020 HIMANSHU ARORA (PETITIONER)
- UNION OF INDIA & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (2 resolved of 3 detected)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6083/2020 & CM 21872/2020 HIMANSHU ARORA ..... Petitioner Through Ms.Himanshi Shakya, Adv. for Mr.Yogesh Sharma, Mr.Prashant Badola, Advs. HIMANSHU ARORA ..... Petitioner Through Ms.Himanshi Shakya, Adv. for Mr.Yogesh Sharma, Mr.Prashant Badola, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, UOI with Mr.Sahaj Garg, Mr.Amit Gupta, Advs. Through Mr.Chetan Sharma, ASG with Mr.Kirtiman Singh, CGSC, UOI with Mr.Sahaj Garg, Mr.Amit Gupta, Advs.
Mr.Vijay Joshi, Sr.Panel Counsel, UOI.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAO R R17.09.2020
This hearing has been held by video conferencing.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the petitioner is covered by the judgment dated 04.11.2019 of this Court passed in W.P.(C) 9088/2018, titled Mukut Pathak & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The learned counsel for the respondents, however, submits that the petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches.
I do not find any merit in the objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondents. Coordinate Bench of this Court, in its judgment dated 02.09.2020 passed in WP(C) 5490/2020, titled Sandeep Agarwal & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has already rejected such submission.
In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the abovementioned judgment of this Court in W.P.(C) 9088/2018, titled Mukut Pathak & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 RN
NAVIN CHAWLA, J