W.P.(C)/6542/2020 of SUCHITA BHATT & ANR. Vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Parties
- + W.P.(C) 6542/2020 SUCHITA BHATT & ANR (PETITIONER)
- UNION OF INDIA & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1 resolved of 3 detected)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6542/2020 SUCHITA BHATT & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Prashant Badola, Mr.Yogesh Sharma & Ms.Himanshi Shakya, Advs. SUCHITA BHATT & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Prashant Badola, Mr.Yogesh Sharma & Ms.Himanshi Shakya, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Through
..... Respondents
Mr.Bijan Kumar Singh, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
% 17.09.2020
This hearing has been held by video conferencing.
CM 22902/2020(Exemption from filing notarized affidavit and dimannexures)
1. This application has been filed seeking exemption from filing duly notarized affidavit and dim annexures. Binding the deponent of the affidavit to the contents of the application, the exemption is granted.
2. Application is disposed of.
WP(C) 6542/2020 & CM 22903/2020
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is covered by the judgment dated 04.11.2019 of this Court passed in W.P.(C) 9088/2018, titled Mukut Pathak & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The learned counsel for the respondents, however, submits that the petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches.
I do not find any merit in the objection raised by the learned counsel for the respondents. Coordinate Bench of this Court, in its judgment dated 02.09.2020 passed in WP(C) 5490/2020, titled Sandeep Agarwal & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., has already rejected such submission.
In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the abovementioned judgment of this Court in W.P.(C) 9088/2018, titled Mukut Pathak & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
SEPTEMBER 17, 2020 RN
NAVIN CHAWLA, J